Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Negative Externalities in Cars

http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2334915.ece


According to this source, which was recently published, the high production and use of automobiles in England are actually producing more negative externalities than just pollution. The high demand by the population for cars is matched by a high supply of automobiles by numerous firms in the market. Cars are known for the amounts of pollution they produce, however, only recently was another negative externality discovered, that the cars increase chances of urban flooding. This urban flooding is caused by the high demand of land used for roads/parking lots and other car related structures due to the rising numbers of cars. This leads to the earth around these areas to be unable to soak up the majority of the rainfalls causing frequent flooding.

Negative externalities are defined as costs that result from an economic transaction that affect other groups or third parties negatively. This means that when producing certain goods, third parties could be negatively affected, in this case pollution and flooding. With negative externalities in society, the supply of the good is at equilibrium for the firms and the car industry, however, for society, the construction of the cars and roads exceeds the optimum amount wanted. This means that although the firms are producing at their own optimal level or efficiency, they are not producing at society's optimum level, making it a market failure and making it an inefficient system. A market failure occurs when resources are overallocated or underallocated, in this situation, cars and roads are being overallocated causing flooding, therefore resulting in market failure, as seen in the graph below.

As seen in the graph above the equilibrium point of the firms is not equal to the optimal equilibrium. The marginal private costs exceed the marginal social costs, showing that cars and roads are being overallocated, causing in the "external cost" to exist as seen by the arrow in between the two cost curves. Governments have several options to try and shift the marginal private closer closer to the optimal cost curve.

One of these options is to tax firms that are producing cars, or tax the construction of roads to prevent pollution and flooding from occuring. By taxing the firms that construct cars and roads, the production of these goods will be lowered, and the price of these good would increase. The amount of tax would depend on the good itself, and the amount of the tax would affect how far the marginal private cost curve shifts. The tax can be determined by matching the amount taxed to the external cost to equal the two curves. By taxing the car industry, less cars would be produced, reducing the amount of pollution in the air, and get all the car buyers/sellers to bear full costs of cars(which is more now since they cause urban floods as well). Also by building less roads, or making the road production more expensive, flooding can be prevented, because less natural land would be covered by roads.

As seen here in the second graph, when taxes are implemented for the production of cars or roads, the supply of the goods shifts down/towards the left. When compared to the first graph, it can be seen that the marginal private cost is closer to the optimal cost, decreasing the overall amount of external costs.

Another option the government has is to subsidize land owners, who may sell their lands to firms who want to place roads there. If the government subsidizes the land owners, the supply of land would shift closer to an optimal level for society and may get quite close to the optimal level. This would also reduce the amounts of roads built, thus decreasing the amount of cars since they are complementary goods. This would allow for less amounts of flooding, since the natural land is able to soak up the water created from rainfall instead of flooding if there were roads.

A final method could be to make the construction of roads in certain areas of England completely illegal, to prevent the entire flooding situation from further escalating. By making it illegal, and implementing fines to those firms who continue mass production, supply of the cars and roads will be reduced. However, depending on the amount fined, firms may decide to continue to supply the cars and roads, if profit is still available. So these are three methods the government in England can use, however, thus far, the government has not done anything to prevent the pollution and urban floods.

8 comments:

Jason Welker said...

Dennis,

Your commentary is basically one long abstract at this point. You need to start over and include some economic analysis of the subject at hand here. How is this a market failure? (i.e. what product is being over provided or under provided?) How can the government begin to deal with this problem? What are the tools that might correct this market failure? You will want to include definitions and explanations of the relevant economic terms, find evidence from the reading that this is in fact a market failure, and propose solutions demonstrating your understanding of the theory and application. Refer to the commentary rubric to review what needs to be included. You have a lot of work to do on this and I'd like you to keep this blog updated with your progress.

The article is okay, not great, but okay... be sure to focus on the whole story, not just cars but the construction in SE England and the possible externalities resulting from that as well.

Good start, Mr. Welker

Dennis said...

Mr. Welker could you give my commentary a final feedback before i hand it in tomorrow, just to see what adjustments i can still make thanks, and how do we include a cover page with the title, word count, etc. on our blog??

Jason Welker said...

Hi Dennis,

this is much better, it's pretty good so far... I'm still reading, however... Let's look at a couple of sections:

"This means that although the firms are producing at their own optimal level or efficiency, they are not producing at society's optimum level, making it a market failure and making it an inefficient system. A market failure occurs when resources are overallocated or underallocated, in this situation, cars and roads are being overallocated causing flooding, therefore resulting in market failure."

This section could be stated more clearly. Refer to the diagram here by saying something like "as seen in fig. 1". Also, you should define negative externality more clearly. "the supply of the cars exceeds the optimum supply curve". This is inconsistent wording, also hard to understand.

"The supply curve for the good is to the right of the optimal supply curve". Again, strange wording. you should refer to these curves not as supply curves but as "Marginal Social Cost" and "Marginal Private Cost". If you don't know what I'm referring to here, look at the readings.

"shift the firm's supply closer to the optimal supply". Again, this should be referring to the government's attempt to get the firm to internalize the costs it's been externalizing; in this case the damage caused by increased flooding in this city. Make it very clear what the government wants to do! It wants to get car buyers and car sellers to bear the full cost of operating cars, which is more than you might think, because of the flooding that results from the increased use of cars!

The gov't could "tax the construction of roads" as you say... they could also tax automakers, reducing the supply of cars and increasing their prices. You need to indicate what the amount of the tax should be though, not the number, but how, specifically, it should be calculated. Ask me in class tomorrow if you don't know how to do this...

Let's also talk about the subsidy idea as well.. sound interesting.

See you in school tomorrow.

Mr. W

James said...

Dennis,

I think that you need to reread this and fix some of the errors in the writing itself. I also think that you should include an explaination about how it is the firm that is externalizing its costs, placing the burden on society, creating the negative externality of pollution. You should mention how government's goals in taxing the firms and placing regulations on roads internalizes the firms previously externalized costs.
You should stick with flooding instead of pollution in general, there is no need to mention air pollution becuase it is separate to the issue of flooding.
The commentry has potential, just try to keep the above points in mind when you look over it again.

Sattaking said...

ib maths We provide seivices in Delhi/NCR for ib Chemistry We have Chemistry tutors with many years of experience tutoring students from high school to college and grad school ib math

Sattaking said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
James Kartan said...

ib economics Visit us for IB Economics Home Tutor in Delhi, IB Economics Home Tutor in Gurgaon, IB Economics Tutor in Delhi, IB Economics Tutor in Gurgaon.
ib math hl

cullen_boyy_ said...

Well informative Blog
Best IB Physics Online Tutor in New York Contact for IB Physics, AP Physics and IGCSE Physics